Comparisons

Compare intelligence work with adjacent advisory formats.

These pages clarify where MI fits: decision-tied intelligence work for leaders who need source-grounded judgment before the next call.

Request briefing View services

Decision contexts

Find the question closest to the decision.

Each page narrows the work into triggers, evidence under watch, analyst judgment, and the briefing output.

Corporate intelligence vs. market research

Corporate intelligence supports a decision. Market research describes the market.

Market research is useful context. Corporate intelligence is built for a call: proceed, wait, respond, escalate, renegotiate, or keep watching.

Competitive intelligence vs. corporate intelligence

Competitive intelligence is one lane inside corporate intelligence.

A competitor watch may be enough when the decision depends on a rival. Corporate intelligence is broader when the decision depends on several outside actors.

OSINT vs. due diligence

OSINT is a source method. Diligence is a decision process.

OSINT can support diligence, but it is not the whole process. The decision determines which open sources matter and how much confidence they should carry.

Intelligence briefing vs. consulting report

An intelligence briefing gives leaders the read they need for the next call.

Consulting reports often explain a broader business problem. Intelligence briefings are narrower: what moved, what we can prove, what remains open, and which action the evidence supports.

Direct answers

Questions leaders ask before they engage MI.

How does Meyer Intelligence work?

MI frames the leadership decision, sets watch requirements, judges evidence quality, and briefs what changed, what is confirmed, what remains open, and which action the evidence supports.

Next step

Send the decision context. We will come prepared.

Share the decision, timing pressure, and outside activity. We will review the context before responding and come prepared with the first evidence questions.

Request briefing